Love Poem: So Many Struggles, So Little Time
Gerald Dillenbeck Avatar
Written by: Gerald Dillenbeck

So Many Struggles, So Little Time

Why does "sacrilegious"
mean struggling against sacred multicultural experience
rather than struggling with re-ligioning monotheistic divinity
as notnot dualling dividity?

How could prodigal sons and daughters
struggle against their prodigy potential,
yet not struggle with our prodigious potentiality?

When would a natural spirit
struggle against spirituality
rather than struggle with nondual spirit co-relational nature?

Which reminds me,
why does human nature
mean struggling against nature
rather than struggling with articulating integrative humane races
within and toward co-arising nature?

Where does contentiousness
suggest warring against contentment
rather than wrestling with nondual appositional content?

How did death economic reassurance
land on "life insurance"?

Who thought mental dis-ease
could not be compatible with mental health
emerging overdue internal/external
ego/eco-conversations?

Why isn't anger management
more importantly love optimization development?

How could eco-normative cooperative evolutionary transactions
have become eco-dislogical monochromatic competition
to store nutrients in safe deposit boxes
where they become detrimental risk of loss
with inevitably unsafe-able death?

If elation
predicts relations
predict resilient correlations
then why not evolution
predicts revolution
predicts resonant eco-revolutionary systems,
merging regenerative love of EarthTribe health?

If bilateral past-future time co-gravitates,
then why wouldn't bicameral love/anger Left
with dipolar integrity/dualdark fear Right
eco-arise?

Why would a natural eco-spirit inductive-recessive
notnot nondually evolve 
a spiritual ego-natural deductive dominant?

If mythic creation stories of why we live
articulate dualdark logos dipolarity of how we purgatively die
while living within a WinWin naturally regenerative,
integral,
and unitarian Earth-Home-Universe,
then how are not all cultural nurturances
both universal and unitarian econatured?

How could a healthy integral, integrative re-ligion
re-tying
re-knotting
re-membering
re-connecting
re-linking,
re-syncing bicameral verb
become such a toxically divisive 
anthrocentrically universal noun?

Why couldn't nurture DNA nature
as DNA-nature eco/ego nondually dipolarizes nurturing love,
integrity as positive-regenerative?

Why isn't bilateral Time
spelled "Tao"
and defined as self-reiteratively progenitive 
Ego/EcoPresence?

Why are polycultural languages and values and political economies
dual-destined
to emerge polypaths
toward regenerative ecologos of bilateral co-arising global polyculture,
guilds and cooperative networks emerging nondual revolving Time,
as SunGod rises with prodigious eco-hope
yet nocturnally arrests with prodigal ego-suffering,
jonesing about lonely hope
invested in restoring EarthJust systemic health
as one more dawn of life incarnate-memory?